From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "hans(at)matfyz(dot)cz" <hans(at)matfyz(dot)cz>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: discovering types |
Date: | 2020-08-12 13:31:40 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa4wRFsX6qfBE28GVau_9=pW0yEAZ26R8Kp7SOnjLEXbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wednesday, August 12, 2020, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype.html
> Description:
>
> Thank you for perfect documentation. Please add subchapter about
> discovering
> types. Themes like List all available types, Get type of column with
> pg_typeof() function, with sql into information_schema.columns, with psql
> \d
> command etc.,
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3827828/how-to-check-type-of-value-in-
> postgres.
> Thank you in advance, Hans
>
Doesn’t seem worth the effort. The documentation is the best discovery
resource while whatever admin tool one uses, psql in core, provides info
about schema columns. pg_typeof is documented but seldom useful. Maybe a
cross-reference to it is warranted elsewhere but adding a complete
sub-section for this topic seems a bit much.
If one were to submit such a patch I’d consider it but its not something
that I consider as a existing omission.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-08-13 22:17:56 | json_populate_record |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-08-12 13:06:13 | discovering types |