Re: WHERE col = ANY($1) extended to 2 or more columns?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WHERE col = ANY($1) extended to 2 or more columns?
Date: 2023-02-09 16:37:29
Message-ID: CAKFQuwa20KW+Lza0NrOXTQxcpFJRQG=zjwz4LkB9u7DXxEHkBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:28 AM Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> > On 9 Feb 2023, at 16:41, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. We are implementing an API which takes a list of row keys, and must
> return info about those rows. To implement that efficiently, in as few
> round-trips as possible, we bind a (binary) array of keys (ints, uuids, or
> strings) and that works great, but only if the key is a scalar one.
> >
> > Now we'd like to do the same for composite keys, and I don't know how to
> do that.
> > Is it possible? Could someone please help out or demo such a thing?
> > We are doing it in C++ using libpq, but a pure SQL or PL/pgSQL demo
> would still help (I think).
>
> This works:
>
> => select (1, 'one'::text) in ((1, 'two'::text), (2, 'one'::text), (1,
> 'one'::text), (2, 'two'::text));
> ?column?
> ----------
> t
> (1 row)
>
>
But you cannot write the right-side of the IN as a single parameter which
seems to be the primary constraint trying to be conformed to.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2023-02-09 16:51:13 Re: Using PostgreSQL for service discovery and health-check
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2023-02-09 16:28:37 Re: WHERE col = ANY($1) extended to 2 or more columns?