On Monday, December 13, 2021, Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> There must be a reason to prefer a “language sql” procedure over a
> “language plpgsql” procedure—otherwise the former wouldn’t be supported.
>
I would say that is true for functions. I wouldn’t assume that for
procedures - it’s probable that because sql already worked for functions we
got that feature for free when implementing procedures.
David J.