From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Avi Weinberg <AviW(at)gilat(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple SELECT statements Using One WITH statement |
Date: | 2022-01-20 23:35:14 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa-iGo4xNiZQ0v35Dx1e2qQAv5cMdf2jcoxpipMyRT+oQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:34 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:32 PM Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:46 AM David G. Johnston <
>> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can always write:
>>>
>>> CREATE VIEW cte_view AS
>>> WITH cte AS (...)
>>> SELECT * FROM cte;
>>>
>>> And then incorporate that into any queries that require the results of
>>> said CTE.
>>>
>>>
>> Is there any advantage to still using a CTE inside the view
>> definition, and then selecting it? Instead of just
>>
>> CREATE VIEW cte_view AS
>> (...);
>>
>> Just curious, in case I'm missing something!
>>
>>
> No. That would be tunnel vision and early morning posting on my part.
>
>
Though I suspect if the CTE had a MATERIALIZED modifier there would be a
difference. You can force a view to be materialized.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Lewis | 2022-01-21 04:03:51 | Re: Query much slower from php than psql or dbeaver |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-01-20 23:34:15 | Re: Multiple SELECT statements Using One WITH statement |