Re: Rules and Command Status - update/insert/delete rule with series of commands in action

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rules and Command Status - update/insert/delete rule with series of commands in action
Date: 2024-05-30 20:56:06
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZzuP6tPsZeS7=7n--SS7FxD28urHzkmsBSpmpL5=vHVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 30, 2024, 12:32 johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com <johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Any thoughts?
>
Very little interest exists in working on user-specified rules. They are
practically deprecated.

>
> Any interest in perhaps providing a choice via a configuration
> parameter?
>

Almost certainly not. Configuration should not affect query behavior. If
anything is done it would have to be new syntax. Though I haven't explored
the use case presented. See the first point. I sure don't have the
requisite familiarity here.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2024-05-30 21:19:52 Re: Rules and Command Status - update/insert/delete rule with series of commands in action
Previous Message José Mello Júnior 2024-05-30 20:37:20 Re: Dll libpq.dll 32 bits