Re: split_part for the last element

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikhil Benesch <nikhil(dot)benesch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split_part for the last element
Date: 2020-10-23 18:20:50
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZyK0NOuy5jaaV_VuSh1x7SKyTgcvaM0mwCaxfZ=QNBhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:47 AM Nikhil Benesch <nikhil(dot)benesch(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Is there another option I'm missing? Would there be interest in
> extending split part so that negative indices counted from the end, as
> in:
>
> split_part('foo bar baz', ' ', -1) -> 'baz'
>

Some thoughts:

I'm torn here because this would be the first usage of this concept in
PostgreSQL (I think).

Tangentially, I noticed that we have a "starts_with" function but no
corresponding "end_with".

It's been a while but there used to be a systemic inertia working
against adding minor useful functions such as these.

With the new documentation layout I would at least consider updating the
description for the normal functions with an example on how to formulate an
expression that works contra-normally, and in the case where there does
exist such a specialized function, naming it.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-23 18:35:00 Re: split_part for the last element
Previous Message Nikhil Benesch 2020-10-23 17:27:47 Re: split_part for the last element