Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

>
> I disagree here, actually. Temporary tables are a different beast
> because they require automated cleanup which would include interacting
> with the partitionining information if temp and non-temp relations are
> mixed. That's why the current restrictions are in place: you should
>
[ not ] ?

> be able to mix them.
>

My point is that if you feel that treating logged as a copy-able property
is OK then doing the following should also just work:

postgres=# create temp table parentt ( id integer ) partition by range (id);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# create table child10t partition of parentt for values from (0)
to (9);
ERROR: cannot create a permanent relation as partition of temporary
relation "parentt"

i.e., child10t should be created as a temporary partition under parentt.

David J.