| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Korim <pkorim(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation synopsis grammar |
| Date: | 2018-05-11 18:55:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZunHFbZ_jDc3nu7ud6uEmO9qC32GEy-zUXWY847SLC0w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Friday, May 11, 2018, Peter Korim <pkorim(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hallo
>
> I search for it and did notsucceeded.
> Where is exact definition of the grammar used here?
>
> I thing the text "[,...]" is unclear concerning what is to be repeted.
>
Not that I've found, do you have an example?
>
> here:
> *https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/notation.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/notation.html>*
> you state
> *" Dots (...) mean that the preceding element can be repeated. "*
>
> from that definition the fragment "[,...]" means zero or more commas.
>
> It is often so that not one element but several elements are repeated .
>
In which case each one requires a comma separating it from the previous one.
>
> Sometimes from the context, one may find out how it is meant.
>
> In other cases it not so clear.
>
Again, You will need to point out an example. But not all options that
allow multiples require commas to separate them.
>
> Well do you have a definition or third party standard?
>
>
You linked to it above...
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-05-11 19:01:48 | Re: documentation synopsis grammar |
| Previous Message | Peter Korim | 2018-05-11 12:46:37 | documentation synopsis grammar |