Re: documentation synopsis grammar

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Korim <pkorim(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation synopsis grammar
Date: 2018-05-11 18:55:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZunHFbZ_jDc3nu7ud6uEmO9qC32GEy-zUXWY847SLC0w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Friday, May 11, 2018, Peter Korim <pkorim(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hallo
>
> I search for it and did notsucceeded.
> Where is exact definition of the grammar used here?
>
> I thing the text "[,...]" is unclear concerning what is to be repeted.
>

Not that I've found, do you have an example?

>
> here:
> *https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/notation.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/notation.html>*
> you state
> *" Dots (...) mean that the preceding element can be repeated. "*
>
> from that definition the fragment "[,...]" means zero or more commas.
>
> It is often so that not one element but several elements are repeated .
>

In which case each one requires a comma separating it from the previous one.

>
> Sometimes from the context, one may find out how it is meant.
>

> In other cases it not so clear.
>

Again, You will need to point out an example. But not all options that
allow multiples require commas to separate them.

>
> Well do you have a definition or third party standard?
>
>
You linked to it above...

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-05-11 19:01:48 Re: documentation synopsis grammar
Previous Message Peter Korim 2018-05-11 12:46:37 documentation synopsis grammar