Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message
Date: 2018-08-18 21:26:06
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZtyaOBJ9i0TGQe0fXQg6ma8imo28BGiaiFZR3zS6db4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, August 18, 2018, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> It’s cosmetic, but it’s a cosmetic bug: it incorrectly tells the user that
> they
> must be the owner of the “relational” when in reality it’s the
> materialized view.
>

Materialized views are a type of relation so it is not wrong, just one of
many instances where we generalize to "relation" based in implementation
details ins team of being explicit about which type of relation is being
affected.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-08-18 21:30:28 Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-18 21:05:02 Re: remove ATTRIBUTE_FIXED_PART_SIZE