Re: Bug in copy

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: me nefcanto <sn(dot)1361(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in copy
Date: 2025-02-09 14:13:40
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZrXhx7nxr1RNWUqFWCAFBAroFH1Dksyi2jCpW3zaOMxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sunday, February 9, 2025, me nefcanto <sn(dot)1361(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> @David, I saw that pg_bulkload. Amazing performance. But that's a command
> line tool. I need to insert bulk data in my Node.js app, via code.
>

That seems like an arbitrary limitation to impose on yourself. Given that,
there is no solution that will satisfy you that I am aware of.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-02-09 16:39:47 Re: Bug in copy
Previous Message me nefcanto 2025-02-09 12:33:57 Re: Bug in copy