Re: Clarification on the docs

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clarification on the docs
Date: 2025-04-12 02:03:38
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZrL59BXqZB8c1x-dsUwSunDO=D39+kra0z+JraVcV6+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 6:49 PM Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi, ALL,
> On the
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-createindex.html#SQL-CREATEINDEX-STORAGE-PARAMETERS
> its said:
>
> [quote]
> The optional WITH clause specifies storage parameters for the index.
> Each index method has its own set of allowed storage parameters. The
> B-tree, hash, GiST and SP-GiST index methods all accept this
> parameter:
> [/quote]
>
>
These are the index methods and the valid lists for each. The docs are
correct in how they remove duplication. I'm undecided on whether that is
the best presentation choice. I would at minimum place a new paragraph
after "own set of allowed storage parameters." so that "The B-tree,
hash..." begins its own line.

B-tree:
fillfactor
deduplicate_items

Hash:
fillfactor

Gist:
fillfactor
buffering

SP-Gist:
fillfactor

GIN:
fastupdate
gin_pending_list_limit

BRIN:
pages_per_range
autosummarize

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Korot 2025-04-12 03:08:48 Re: Clarification on the docs
Previous Message Igor Korot 2025-04-12 01:48:55 Clarification on the docs