From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
Date: | 2015-09-07 21:08:48 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZq=uaSxT5SionHDQaXMh0UUzW5H6VNsXYLqsKiDODfcA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-09-07 22:14 GMT+02:00 Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm not dead set on \rotate and suggested other names
>> > previously in [1], but none of them seems decisively
>> > superior.
>>
>>
>> Fwiw I like \rotate. It's pretty clear what it means and it sounds
>> similar to but not exactly the same as pivot.
>>
>
> rotate ~ sounds like transpose matrix, what is not true in this case.
>
>
So? If PostgreSQL had any native matrix processing capabilities this would
maybe warrant a bit of consideration.
https://github.com/hadley/tidyr
\spread
\unfold
\rotate
Given the role that psql performs I do think \rotate to be the least
problematic choice; I concur that avoiding \pivot is desirable due to SQL's
usage.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-09-07 21:14:34 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2015-09-07 20:52:31 | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |