Re: 10.0

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gražvydas Valeika <gvaleika(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-06-20 19:35:38
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZpa3ckNzZE3b4rgk8iPFBs7ed5bYoDzSFtGQ7CZE-+4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Gražvydas Valeika <gvaleika(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I recently bumped into http://semver.org/
>
> It can be interesting to participants of this discussion.
>
> Especially motivation for minor version (middle number).
>
>
​While we appreciate the comment this is third (maybe forth) time this has
come up during this discussion - the last being 20 emails and 3 days ago.
In short, we don't and never will be semver compliant so if anything its
numbering protocol is something to avoid, not embrace.

David J.

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-06-20 19:07:34 from Gražvydas Valeika

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-20 19:54:38 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-06-20 19:33:02 Re: Reviewing freeze map code