Re: documentation structure

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com, jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: documentation structure
Date: 2024-07-19 04:07:20
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZhikLAfG9ntU-611adW0AnnPFJ_wx7Hy3Lb_v7M7x27Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 8:06 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> > I'm opposed to having a separate file for every function. I think
> > breaking up func.sgml into one piece per sect1 is about right. If that
> > proves cumbersome still we can look at breaking it up further, but
> > let's start with that.
>
> That will create at least 30 func-xx.sgml files.
>
> t-ishii$ grep '<sect1' func.sgml|wc -l
> 30
>
> I am afraid that's too many?
>
>
The premise and the resultant number of files both seem reasonable to me.
I could get that number down to maybe 20 if pressed but I don't see any
benefit to doing so. I look at a page on the website that needs updating
then go open its source file. Nice and tidy.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2024-07-19 05:01:54 Re: d844cd75a and postgres_fdw
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-07-19 04:00:01 Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()