Re: Pg_stat_activity

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg_stat_activity
Date: 2025-02-16 01:02:05
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZh6YYC3dsiaK38DC19K9w9gLPT3WRBWJr8-s3SRncAag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, February 15, 2025, Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> If I see a sudden connection spike (say once in 2 months). What are the
> steps I need to follow as a dba?
>
> Check idle and kill? Check of stat activity for active queries? How do I
> ensure how much time is long running query? Blocking queries? How much of
> blocking time is considered to be dangerous? Locks - should we conclude
> anything from wait event and wait event type ?
>
> All these won't help nd have to look into pgbadger?
>

This is an inappropriate question for the -hackers mailing list. Both
-admin and -general are better places to get help on learning how to be a
DBA.

This list is basically for discussing potential patches to the codebase.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-02-16 01:15:15 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Previous Message Rajesh Kumar 2025-02-16 00:31:15 Pg_stat_activity