Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pf(at)pfortin(dot)com" <pf(at)pfortin(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?
Date: 2023-11-12 01:26:59
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZgZvD+Ha4YV9GJ=k6U45EyrM2riSh4YcZGkXixdtig7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Saturday, November 11, 2023, <pf(at)pfortin(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I had no idea functions need permissions... GRANT EXTENSION..?
>

You really need to get away from thinking anything you are doing has to do
with extensions. As you noted the function you found is in the core part
of the documentation so it isn’t an extension.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2023-11-12 01:37:24 Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2023-11-12 01:21:56 Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?