From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DROP ROLE as SUPERUSER |
Date: | 2025-02-20 15:56:47 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZgEfQ1pJVPAwLM0MrFCpjhMKhxDxWbbqBOQgWG+DPStw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, February 20, 2025, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 20, 2025, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi. Today I was surprised that REVOKE ALL ON DATABASE FROM ROLE silently
>> did nothing, even with CASCADE, when I was running it as SUPERUSER,
>> preventing DROP'ing the ROLE. I had to manually SET ROLE to the GRANTOR, do
>> the REVOKE, which DID something this time, and then I could DROP the role.
>>
>> That's hardly convenient :). And I was helping someone else who couldn't
>> figure out how to drop that role. Isn't there a better way?
>>
>> I thought SUPERUSER was more powerful that than. Why isn't it?
>>
>
> This has nothing to do with power/permissions. It is about not specifying
> “granted by” in your SQL command and thus failing to fully and correctly
> specify the single permission you want to revoke.
>
Well, not “single permission” but the ALL only applies to the permission
types, not actually everything for all grantors.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-20 16:05:50 | Re: DROP ROLE as SUPERUSER |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-02-20 15:55:21 | Re: DROP ROLE as SUPERUSER |