Re: Postgres 9.6.2 and pg_log

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mark Watson <mark(dot)watson(at)jurisconcept(dot)ca>
Cc: "(pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.6.2 and pg_log
Date: 2017-04-24 17:33:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZfr=-LhHOjQGJ5yiAYNLNVesnP59fQE8X9F8WzvncH1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Mark Watson <mark(dot)watson(at)jurisconcept(dot)ca>
wrote:

> Good day all,
>
>
>
> I just noticed an anomaly regarding the logging. I have my logging set up
> as follows:
>
> log_filename = 'postgresql-%d.log'
>
> log_truncate_on_rotation = on
>

​I don't see "log_rotation_age" and/or "log_rotation_size" here [1] and at
least one needs to be set in order to enable actual rotation; the
"truncate" option simply tells PostgreSQL what to do when encountering a
file with the same name during the rotation process.​

log_rotation_age apparently has under-documented intelligence since I would
expect a server that starts up mid-hour and uses a 60 minute rotation to
rotate mid-hour as well so the log would contain 1 hours worth of data but
the leading hours would be different. The examples in
log_truncate_on_rotation indicate that this isn't the case. I have not
tested reality or read the source.

This is on Windows 10, 64-bit
>
> PostgreSQL 9.2.2, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit
>
> (EnterpriseDB installer)
>
>
>
> Note that this is not a major concern on my end; postgres 9.6.2 has
> otherwise been running flawlessly.
>
>
>
​Um...you're reporting a very outdated 9.2 release in the supposed
copy-paste job above but claiming 9.6.2 ...

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/runtime-config-logging.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-LOGGING-WHERE

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chiru r 2017-04-24 17:58:21 Re: Block size recommendation for Red Hat Linux 7.2
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2017-04-24 16:29:51 Re: Block size recommendation for Red Hat Linux 7.2