Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com" <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
Date: 2016-05-05 22:12:55
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZeJEAfKUQxFJbAjuH0gHrU_MdwfK0NDf7__5uODxZ1vQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
>
>
> 2) You have a where clause: company_id = NEW.id
>> 3) NEW refers to users
>> 4) NEW.id is obstensibly a USER ID
>>
>
>
> No...
>
>
​Which one of the three do you disagree with?
​

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-05 22:17:12 Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
Previous Message drum.lucas@gmail.com 2016-05-05 22:10:55 Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2