From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
Cc: | Felipe Santos <felipepts(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Clark <steve(dot)clark(at)netwolves(dot)com>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dumb question |
Date: | 2016-06-02 17:58:47 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZeDWL1xp8oab1rXHKoXpbMOaYbfheRKsOZ=LdjcjRdgw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Steve Crawford <
scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Felipe Santos <felipepts(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think sts=0 means ref_id is null
>>
>> So, what I think he wants to achieve is:
>>
>> select max(id) from yourtable where sts=0 and id not in (select ref_id
>> from yourtable);
>>
>> Isn't it?
>>
>> The OP will need to explain further as we are all guessing. As I
> mentioned in my earlier (accidental top - curses GMail) post, table
> structures and the query or queries that don't work would be useful. So
> would a description of the problem that is being solved since there could
> be better approaches.
>
>
Maybe we mis-interpreted but as written this is the solution. My out-loud
thinking was a more verbose version of this.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | rverghese | 2016-06-02 18:01:36 | Partitioned tables do not return affected row counts to client |
Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2016-06-02 17:48:50 | Re: dumb question |