| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wen Yi <wen-yi(at)qq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | How can udf c function return table, not the rows? |
| Date: | 2024-07-19 13:04:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZbZ-j47uwOcYRquLcd0JzjkuRHtEMTF+HYH-FLmV+zYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, July 18, 2024, Wen Yi <wen-yi(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> pg_get_functiondef
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In my expectations, it should be:
>
> oid | pg_get_functiondef
>
> ------+-----------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
>
> Can someone give my some advice?
>
>
Write:
Select * from function_call()
Instead of
Select function_call()
Guessing a bit since you never did show the first query.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-07-19 13:17:21 | Re: Can we use parallel workers to create index without active/transaction snapshot? |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2024-07-19 13:03:57 | Re: Add new COPY option REJECT_LIMIT |