Re: Document NULL

In reply to Marcos:

> The word below is commonly used on DOCs, but I didn't find it as a link.
Wouldn't it be better to write what you are linking to, instead of the word
below ?

I've changed many of these links into simple xref elements for now. I may
add alternate text but since the majority of the docs seem fine with bare
xref I'm just going with that here as well.

On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 8:30 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> hi.
>
> "SQL specification" should be "SQL standard"?
>
> + another null vale and unequal to all other values.
> typo. should be "another null value"
>
> other places using subsection, many places in doc/src/sgml/nullvalues.sgml
> using "sub-section".
>

Fixed all of these.

> + Notice two important behaviors: first, even though we passed in a
> null value to
> + to the <literal>set_config</literal> function, the
> <literal>current_setting</literal>
> there is two "to to".
>
> gmail has grammar checks, chatgpt can also help find typos.
> you can give it a try.
>

Yeah, I did spell check but not a grammar check. These weren't spelling
errors though. Anyway, good point running the resultant web page through
chatgpt or grammar-aware program.

I still need to put together the example changes in these last couple of
suggestions. The attached v6 omits those and the indenting - and I've
consolidated it back into a single patch.

David J.