Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Date: 2023-05-03 16:13:57
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZXQP7ox0jsa+AqKa-4MkTpd2VypJm9dkXsk+6wKEQ2Gg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:00 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

> On 4/13/23 8:44 AM, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
>
> > P.S. If no objections I plan to add this patch to Open Items for v16
> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items
>
> [RMT hat]
>
> I don't see why this is an open item as this feature was not committed
> for v16. Open items typically revolve around committed features.
>
> Unless someone makes a convincing argument otherwise, I'll remove this
> from the Open Items list[1] tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> [1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items

The argument is that updating the psql \d views to show the newly added
options is something that the patch to add those options should have done
before being committed. Or, at worse, we should decide now that we don't
want to do so and spare people the effort of trying to get this committed
later.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-05-03 16:25:09 Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-03 16:00:05 Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command