Re: Doc says nothing about wether CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW can change the COLLATION of an existing field

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pageorge(at)unice(dot)fr, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc says nothing about wether CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW can change the COLLATION of an existing field
Date: 2022-02-15 15:10:00
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZSkg-O4TECajpcxuO=ftOkyiVhGeAPUhE49QnCVkUi9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:04 AM PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

> For this reason, I'm also filling a bug report, since postgresql's reaction
> was not adapted to my request (neither an appropriate error message nor
> successful execution of my SQL statement).
>

The bug report is valid and sufficient. We really don't want to have two
threads active discussing the issue.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2022-02-15 16:17:53 Does the POSITION() function takes into account the COLLATION... or not ?!?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-02-15 15:08:19 Re: tutorial problem solution requires that problem is already fixed