| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists(at)toco-domains(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
| Date: | 2016-03-08 23:09:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZShKPzDLapMtr6_eo34bnf=hrjPHYDyqkA9mNxZnRCXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though,
>> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this
>> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the
>> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this.
>>
>
> Just David and Vik so far. The rest were either against(Simon),
> meh(Robert) or +1ed/-1ed the backpatch, leaving their thoughts on the
> function itself unspoken.
>
> Happy to make the changes above if we're moving forward with it.
>
I'll toss a user-land +1 for this.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-08 23:13:09 | Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-08 23:08:55 | Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes |