From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle to postgres migration |
Date: | 2019-04-08 22:42:57 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZQusooWavcn4Qk2Y_TFLkejeRUAG-UMnDBX=crXaY9Jg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:31 PM Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
wrote:
> I think having a specific migration group would also be likely to
> improve the visibility of pg, and the idea of migrating to pg. As it
> help pg to appear in more search results.
>
>
I presently have qualms retaining novice, sql, performance, and probably
some others. I don't think adding yet another specialized low-volume list
is of particular benefit. Nor do I think it behooves the core project to
be in the center of migration support anyway.
This discussion can and should be moved to -general
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2019-04-08 23:10:17 | Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms) |
Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2019-04-08 22:31:15 | Re: Oracle to postgres migration |