On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:17 PM radiodiversion <radiodiversion(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I still think it would be great if this doc point was worded a little
> differently in new editions.
>
>
Suggestions are welcome.
Without some idea of why you seemed to miss the two seemingly obvious
references that I pointed out (including a fragment you quoted) it's hard
to decide what might be an improvement. It's unappealing to consider
rewriting the documentation based upon the experiences of a sample size of
one without a clear rationale.
David J.