| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-06-20 20:28:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZO1xTAdxCD1+SMAZC1Y4wLwESC6N3biRiYhgj6fT4--g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 10.x is the desired output.
>
> 10.x is the output that some people desire. A significant number of
> people, including me, would prefer to stick with the current
> three-part versioning scheme, possibly with some change to the
> algorithm for bumping the first digit (e.g. every 5 years like
> clockwork).
>
>
I was speaking for the project/community as a distinct entity and not
about any individual contributor. I'm acting as if we're past the point
of individual opinions and votes on the decision to go to a two-part
versioning scheme.
We will still welcome any major revelations that may have gone unconsidered
during the decision making but I find that to be unlikely.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-06-20 20:41:01 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-06-20 20:24:53 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |