From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE ROLE inheritance details |
Date: | 2024-04-04 01:11:47 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZMnW-LyqtwjHxZsm6Wkg5Jeg4sm8oM3H22NT2h36uHGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:16 PM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:49:42PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > + The membership grants created by the
> > + <literal>IN ROLE</literal>, <literal>ROLE</literal>, and
> <literal>ADMIN</literal>
> > + clauses have the role executing this command as the grantee.
>
> This should be s/grantee/grantor/, right?
>
Correct.
> > + If unspecified when create a new role membership this defaults to
> > + the inheritance attribute of the role being added.
>
> Need s/create/creating/. Missing comma. While phrase "role being added"
> isn't wrong, the rest of the paragraph uses "member" and uses "granted
> role"
> to refer to the member-of role. Putting those together:
>
> If unspecified when creating a new role membership, this defaults to the
> inheritance attribute of the new member.
>
I like that better.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2024-04-04 06:30:31 | Need a PostgreSQL 16 developer edition for enabling vector support |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2024-04-03 12:23:22 | Re: tools.ietf.org is decommissioned and our links are redirected |