Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: iseki zero <admin(at)iseki(dot)space>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Date: 2024-10-12 02:38:40
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZJ-BjwUdV6=ACfKwrYQoHZdRZjKdHgbTkakfb-qphE1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday, October 11, 2024, iseki zero <admin(at)iseki(dot)space> wrote:

> So, should I use the [reply to all] button? I'm afraid the receipt list
> will growing to have too many address.
>
>
Yes, just use reply-all. The to list only grows when people reply, and it
is a mailing list - all these people are getting the email anyway…this just
lets them filter on things they have replied to.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message admin 2024-10-12 03:10:46 Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Previous Message iseki zero 2024-10-12 02:25:08 Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section