Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pf(at)pfortin(dot)com" <pf(at)pfortin(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?
Date: 2023-11-12 02:11:58
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZD8CrkUMU-N81_j1cMJ5x-CbKi+vUb=3MC0vKE2QKpvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Saturday, November 11, 2023, <pf(at)pfortin(dot)com> wrote:

>
> If EXECUTE is really supposed to be required; is it a bug that I
> finally got regexp_replace() to work...?
>

The PUBLIC pseudo-role is granted permission, at the time of the function’s
creation (i.e., as a default privilege) to execute all functions in the
database. All roles inherit the grants given to PUBLIC.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2023-11-12 04:41:26 Re: Server process exited with exit code 4
Previous Message pf 2023-11-12 02:05:23 Re: Aren't regex_*() functions built-in?