On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:32 AM Stefan Houtzager <stefan(dot)houtzager(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks again David. I am very novice, and tried the following which does
> not give an error but returns null instead of []
>
Please don't top-post here.
The general concept should work. You may at least wish to experiment in a
simple query to get the feel for the mechanics. With respect to this query
I'd probably need to have a working query to play with (and time) to give a
more precise answer.
David J.