Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: 孤傲小二～阿沐 <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Date: 2021-11-12 06:09:13
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZBEe9_8e3kOLpYxGdy4FJrO-7gBLnxwRGifNGnA+xS4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday, November 11, 2021, 孤傲小二～阿沐 <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello, I think what you said is right, it should be the problem. But I
> don't know what to do in the lexical analysis system of plpgsql to solve
> this problem.
>
>
“To match” means keep two copies identical, in this case manually. Try
grepping for the pre-change line you are modifying to see where its twin is.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 孤傲小二～阿沐 2021-11-12 06:12:12 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Previous Message 孤傲小二～阿沐 2021-11-12 05:51:10 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database