Re: Multiple psql history files

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jonathan Jacobson <jonjac(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiple psql history files
Date: 2016-10-18 16:43:29
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYzcEoSuTurjs2MzCrZeK2kh1XW3TrcnCUWFyisse5EZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Jonathan Jacobson <jonjac(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The .psql_history file is naturally used by different DB connections
> (distinguished by a different combination of host + port + database + user).
> At least in my multi-database working environment, this leads sometimes to
> frustration because there are commands that cannot or should not be used by
> different connections.
> To solve this, psql could keep a separate command history file for each
> connection.
> I will be happy to make this my first contribution to PostgreSQL's code.
> What do you say?
>
>
​Existing capabilities not withstanding the feature itself would probably
be considered but I'm doubtful it would replace the default behavior.

The user would, at minimum, have to designate​

​a directory into which the separate history files would be created -
polluting the home directory is unappealing.

If you want to propose the specifics of a feature that meets those two
criteria specific comments and opinions on include-ability can be made.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-18 16:45:20 Re: Multiple psql history files
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2016-10-18 16:33:39 Re: Multiple psql history files