From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "luca(dot)bolla(at)gmail(dot)com" <luca(dot)bolla(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: intarray extension installation |
Date: | 2024-08-30 13:54:49 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYxU5VegwKHvBT+ipNTBTS2Aid+zfY866HZiYhkDGfE7A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thursday, August 29, 2024, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/intarray.html
> Description:
>
> Hi,
> can you please specify somewhere that intarray extension is part of contrib
> package?
> I found this out only on a stackoverflow from almost 10 years ago.
Package structure decisions are the responsibility of the package creator.
So the core documentation, which doesn’t get involved with the details of
third-party decisions, doesn’t address them.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | yanliang lei | 2024-09-01 03:36:44 | suggestion about statement_timeout |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2024-08-29 09:34:30 | intarray extension installation |