From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | max_worker_processes default not documented |
Date: | 2016-05-12 13:24:36 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYsb-Wxd9=6xsDxOLWXmWnNL-9C4bmmoVPJPmnGBgsHyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thursday, May 12, 2016, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com');>> wrote:
> On 5/7/16 11:16 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
>> While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is made
>> noticeable by the fact both the immediately preceding and subsequent items
>> in the 9.6 docs specify their default values. Furthermore,
>> max_parallel_degree defaults to 2 but the workers come from the pool sized
>> using max_worker_processes - provoking the very question as to how many is
>> 2 relative to the default pool size.
>>
>
> done
>
>
Thanks. Now for a related question. Are any of those workers permanently
in use? And what processes use them. I can think of checkpoint writer and
autovacuum off the top of my head that are potential candidates.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2016-05-12 19:46:11 | Re: Docbook 5.x |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-05-12 13:20:28 | Re: max_worker_processes default not documented |