Re: Reported type mismatch improperly

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reported type mismatch improperly
Date: 2020-07-18 04:28:51
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYnGcrDB2=B7os7hYS2_ZVwnLoHfSVyUzLLyufKEoOERQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Friday, July 17, 2020, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:23 AM David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> - which they still need to be aware of even though this patch removes one
>> situation where it matters.
>>
>
> Can you provide an example of this? If it is not very troublesome, I'd
> like to fix both.
>

Nothing concrete off hand, more of an impression.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-07-18 14:02:06 Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Previous Message Andy Fan 2020-07-18 04:05:50 Re: Reported type mismatch improperly