From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cast to domain with default collation issue. |
Date: | 2022-05-25 06:38:24 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYm-WdGnZeXWRCf0THZvd63EyguTOYSK5aNfP_AuMdEuQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Please don’t top-post.
On Tuesday, May 24, 2022, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Otherwise, all input expressions must have the same implicit collation
>> derivation or the default collation. If any non-default collation is
>> present, that is the result of the collation combination. Otherwise, the
>> result is the default collation.
>>
>
> I think the above quote part can be used to explain the following
> examples.
>
>> CREATE TABLE test1 ( a text COLLATE "de_DE", b text COLLATE "es_ES", c
>> text );
>> SELECT a < 'foo' FROM test1;
>
> SELECT c < 'foo' FROM test1;
>
> But the *non-default* seems not that correct for me. Like a column if it does not mention anything, then the default value is null. So
> * create table test111( a tex*t) The default collation for column a is the same as the output of *show lc_collate*.
>
> so there is no *non-default? *
>
>
I’m not following the point you are trying to make. table111.a contributes
the default collation for any expression needing a collation implicitly
resolved.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | operations i | 2022-05-25 06:42:30 | Re: How is this possible "publication does not exist" |
Previous Message | jian he | 2022-05-25 05:58:28 | Re: cast to domain with default collation issue. |