From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Clarke <tim(dot)clarke(at)manifest(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: browser interface to forums please? |
Date: | 2017-03-25 17:26:12 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYjsEUSWdV77i_9YFc=2oL0hwX5TyKZ0+Y43YzASA_dUQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday, March 25, 2017, Tim Clarke <tim(dot)clarke(at)manifest(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> On 25/03/17 16:25, David G. Johnston wrote:
> >
> > One constraint is that the current email based flow cannot be
> > disrupted. Adding on a fully integrated forum-like GUI does have some
> > demand. I don't see it being met if the it needs to be custom
> > written. Therefore, do you have any suggestions and examples of
> > communities using such a system?
> >
> > As it stands we have a kind of read-only forum in our archives. It
> > would be nice if there were a form at the bottom of the page that
> > would let you post - or even "send email to me so I can respond".
> >
> > In short, there is always room for usability improvements. You'll get
> > a better response if you focus on those since and explain why.
> >
> > David J.
>
> google groups would support both methods of access imho
>
> I'm not suggesting its a good thing - perfectly happy with just email
> myself and searching the list archives if need be.
>
>
Becomming reliant on a third-party host is a non-starter. Nothing about
the present system is so deficient that status-quo would be a less
appealing option.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | George Neuner | 2017-03-26 05:31:33 | Re: browser interface to forums please? |
Previous Message | Tim Clarke | 2017-03-25 16:37:00 | Re: browser interface to forums please? |