| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "dennisr(at)visi(dot)com" <dennisr(at)visi(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are dns CNAME's allowed or useable in pg_hba.conf hostname specification |
| Date: | 2016-12-05 22:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYfhaCcH3bK=7npTKv5DkjQZ-=AdZXkbzFGJshJrO58Wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Its conventional to bottom (or inline) posts on these forums.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> wrote:
> Honestly, if your DNS is properly setup, it should work fine, yes.
>
I don't understand how placing a non-canonical host name in the
pg_hba.conf can ever result in the following condition being true:
"If a host name is specified [...] that name is compared with the result of
a reverse name resolution of the client's IP address (e.g., reverse DNS
lookup, if DNS is used)."
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | dennisr@visi.com | 2016-12-05 23:05:59 | Re: Are dns CNAME's allowed or useable in pg_hba.conf hostname specification |
| Previous Message | Scott Whitney | 2016-12-05 21:56:40 | Re: Are dns CNAME's allowed or useable in pg_hba.conf hostname specification |