Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-14 22:28:13
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYfLZ0m5Va-ZZcvTkB+WVwAqptEcdp-+W+Hx9UFgxDh6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> As discussed in the thread at [1], I've been working on redesigning
> the tables we use to present SQL functions and operators. The
> first installment of that is now up; see tables 9.30 and 9.31 at
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-datetime.html
>
> and table 9.33 at
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-enum.html
>
>
As I write this the enum headers are centered horizontally while the
datetime ones are left aligned. The centering doesn't do it for me. To
much gap and the data itself is not centered so there is a large
disconnected between the header and the value.

The run-on aspect of the left-aligned setup is of some concern but maybe
just adding some left padding to the second column - and right padding to
the first - can provide the desired negative space without adding so much
as to break usability.

(gonna use embedded images here...)

[image: image.png]

[image: image.png]
David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-04-14 22:36:25 Re: wrong relkind error messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-14 21:31:13 Re: ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison