| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TOAST versus toast |
| Date: | 2025-04-12 02:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYfECXc=+vW-GBsTRBN6=kdeiBrBXf+yM0WGFO3PKSC4Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
> attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
> there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
> isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.
>
>
I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision.
Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is
actively looking for reviewers at this point.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Srinath Reddy | 2025-04-12 03:01:00 | Re: New committer: Jacob Champion |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-04-12 01:13:45 | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |