From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Partitioning Tables |
Date: | 2021-02-05 19:26:54 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY_hC408Jm6ZHCWHhzrO1brMfnStSTnfa4++L3ci8pCFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Friday, February 5, 2021, Campbell, Lance <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>
> It does look like it would work if I added the "type" from the group table
> to the group_member table. But otherwise the PARITION BY LIST does not
> support referencing a parent table.
>
Replace “parent table” with “some random table only related to the table
in question by a foreign key” and it probably will make more sense.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2021-02-05 23:44:56 | Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2021-02-05 19:25:02 | Re: Partitioning Tables |