Re: Partitioning Tables

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioning Tables
Date: 2021-02-05 19:26:54
Message-ID: CAKFQuwY_hC408Jm6ZHCWHhzrO1brMfnStSTnfa4++L3ci8pCFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Friday, February 5, 2021, Campbell, Lance <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>
> It does look like it would work if I added the "type" from the group table
> to the group_member table. But otherwise the PARITION BY LIST does not
> support referencing a parent table.
>

Replace “parent table” with “some random table only related to the table
in question by a foreign key” and it probably will make more sense.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2021-02-05 23:44:56 Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2021-02-05 19:25:02 Re: Partitioning Tables