Re: postgis

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgis
Date: 2022-07-20 14:57:58
Message-ID: CAKFQuwY_NvHuXTNqJsuWZjPx2DVMF4drwPQUiUQzn9qf57Ninw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday, July 20, 2022, Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks for your answer.
> I would like to avoid compiling as much as possible.
> I know that postgis 3.2.1 is available and does install without pb. but..
> That db run an app which is very long to test, so I need to stick to a
> postgis 3.0.x
>

I’m not particularly fluent here but working from the PostGIS project
homepage and into the linked package archives I do not see where what you
want exists. It doesn’t seem like the 3.0.x series is being kept
up-to-date in packaged form.

But you may want to use PostGIS support channels to have a better chance at
getting confirmation/help rather than here.

My general impression is that the packaging, at least for Debian, doesn’t
actually understand how the PostGIS project handles versioning support.
But i may be missing something as I’m doing this web-only and
apt.postgresql.org is basically impossible to inspect on the web.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2022-07-20 15:07:54 Re: Batch process
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2022-07-20 14:52:35 Re: Batch process