From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kiran K V <kirankv(dot)1982(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query related to Logical Replication using test_decoding and unchanged-toast-datum |
Date: | 2025-01-06 16:37:20 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYYpyv_qqLXLKPqTKeY74bUR9XMXzAgUh=OPxYLqn=Ssw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:21 AM Kiran K V <kirankv(dot)1982(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> could you please tell me whether PostgreSQL will truly log these values to
> WAL or not ? If not, what will be entered into WAL for the JSON column if
> it remains unchanged?
>
>
Not quite sure what you are looking for but:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/storage-toast.html#STORAGE-TOAST-ONDISK
"A pointer datum representing an out-of-line on-disk TOASTed value
therefore needs to store the OID of the TOAST table in which to look and
the OID of the specific value (its chunk_id). For convenience, pointer
datums also store the logical datum size (original uncompressed data
length), physical stored size (different if compression was applied), and
the compression method used, if any. Allowing for the varlena header bytes,
the total size of an on-disk TOAST pointer datum is therefore 18 bytes
regardless of the actual size of the represented value."
So the WAL of the main table data will contain 18bytes of data for that
column. If the toast data really hasn't changed during the period in
question the WAL will not contain any data for the toast relation since no
changes to it were made.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-01-06 16:47:55 | Re: Questions about the Debian Package version of pgAdmin |
Previous Message | Kiran K V | 2025-01-06 14:19:47 | Query related to Logical Replication using test_decoding and unchanged-toast-datum |