Quick Links

Re: Postgres do not support tinyint?

From:	"David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	"pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Postgres do not support tinyint?
Date:	2025-01-08 06:44:21
Message-ID:	CAKFQuwYYgPxUSvo2UzOty5Cd1xw5+2q1bg3+zY-nsXNZyq+_4g@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-general

On Tuesday, January 7, 2025, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> 3. The "bit" type might serve your needs.
>
>
You suggest a type with a minimum size of 6 bytes when the complaint is
that the otherwise acceptable 2 byte data type is too large?

David J.

In response to

Re: Postgres do not support tinyint? at 2025-01-08 05:24:21 from Ron Johnson

Responses

Re: Postgres do not support tinyint? at 2025-01-08 06:49:08 from Christophe Pettus
Re: Postgres do not support tinyint? at 2025-01-08 06:53:34 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Christophe Pettus	2025-01-08 06:49:08	Re: Postgres do not support tinyint?
Previous Message	Christophe Pettus	2025-01-08 06:28:14	Re: Postgres do not support tinyint?