Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work?
Date: 2024-07-01 03:14:58
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYWAzPvoeZkT8UFZc7yCwTb8q2RKbwdS5XWM+tEKtE5Sw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 7:52 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> If that's the case, maybe a tiny step towards what Peter proposed is
> just to make trailing punctuation fail for timestamp special values in
> v18.
>
>
I'm game. If anyone is using the ambiguous spelling it is probably to their
benefit to have it break and realize they wanted a function expression, not
a constant expression.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-07-01 03:22:25 Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-07-01 03:08:33 Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work?