On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Christopher Kline <kline(dot)christopher(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Thank you all for the clarification. I like David Johnston's suggestion
> of
> > # capped at max_parallel_workers
> > That clearly defines the constraint.
>
> I was thinking perhaps "# limited by max_parallel_workers"
> or something like that. "Capped at" isn't phraseology we
> use elsewhere.
>
>
"limited by" is indeed better IMO as well.
David J.