From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 德哥 <digoal(at)126(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #16702: inline code and function : when use dynamic name for rowtype, there is some bug! |
Date: | 2020-11-09 16:07:15 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYUuxmFUarSWWPV5ZfG8Mgf2MOy9CdV4Bpme2ScT0yf9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:50 AM 德哥 <digoal(at)126(dot)com> wrote:
> but the execution behavior is biased, either do not replace the value of
> the variable during the execution, but directly use the table name
> corresponding to the variable name.
>
I've lost something in translation. There is no bias (not sure what that
means in this context) or variability/ambiguity here. The thing in front
of %RowType is always an identifier - specifically, a table. That your
function also has a variable of the same name is immaterial to PostgreSQL
since none of the variables in the function are ever considered when it is
expecting/required-to-have an identifier to fulfill the syntax. This is
well-defined in PostgreSQL pl/pgsql and so the observed behavior is not
buggy.
"select tbl%rowtype into a%rowtype" is effectively (cast tbl%rowtype as
a%rowtype) which is a well-defined and the user is responsible for ensuring
the two rowtypes are compatible. "tbl" and "a" are compatible, "b" and "a"
are not, which your original post demonstrates.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heath Lord | 2020-11-09 17:07:53 | Re: REL_13_STABLE Windows 10 Regression Failures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-09 15:16:51 | Re: BUG #16706: insert into on conflict(pk) do update error violates not-null constraint |