| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Loles <lolesft(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: |
| Date: | 2021-05-18 13:50:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYUf+cnQyy4fT2yYC1qp_LeDv6ttbkv4WLX=bSVgSvftQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > as well as the fact that 0 disables the logical replication
> > subscribing feature altogether, and precludes the background worker
> > scheduler process from launching at startup?
>
> I'd be in favor of mentioning the former, but the latter seems like
> an implementation detail.
>
>
I can see that point - but for me the deciding factor is that this detail
ends up showing up in the O/S process list and talking about that is
desirable to me.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Smith | 2021-05-18 15:52:16 | Re: Logical Replication: SELECT pg_catalog.set_config Statement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-18 13:46:09 |